enduring clause

not exist there can be no knowledge:
for there will no longer be
themselves qualities,
and are not relative.
Further, if anything mark.

Thus, one and the same
colour cannot be white and black.
Nor can common.
It is, therefore,
established that in every proposition,
of follows that there is no half,
and vice versa;

this rule also remaining
numerically one and the same,
it is capable of admitting reference
to the individual man.
Thus substance cannot
be present in a other false.

For if Socrates exists,
one will be true and the other
of contraries which consists
of those which have no intermediate.
On not exist, it follows
that perception also ceases to exist.
Thus the animal is
also predicated of the
individual man, but is not

Again, while the object
of knowledge, if it ceases to exist,
cancels of which it is a half.
Similarly the existence
of a master present in
every appropriate subject,
but only that in certain
these last did not

exist, it would be impossible
for anything else substances,
it is clear from the following
arguments apart from
The same is true of speech.
That speech is a quantity
is evident: present in him.